Live Poll — IAC 2026 SpS

Scan during the session to vote live

QR Mentimeter

menti.com · code announced live at session start

77th International Astronautical Congress · Antalya, Türkiye · 5–9 October 2026

From Demonstrations to Operations:
Active Debris Removal from an EU Portfolio Perspective

A Fishbowl Special Session examining why ADR has not yet transitioned from technology demonstrations to an operational space infrastructure protection capability.

Date & Time Thursday, 8 October · 16:15–17:30
Venue NEST Convention Center, Antalya
Symposium A6 — Space Debris
Format Fishbowl + Live Polling · 75 min
📍 8 Oct · 16:15 · NEST Convention Center
European Innovation Council

Funded by the European Union — EIC Pathfinder Challenge 2024: Strengthening the Sustainability and Resilience of EU Space Infrastructure (Horizon Europe programme).

IAF
IAC 2026 Antalya

Panelists

Stella Tkatchova

Stella Tkatchova

Former EIC Programme Manager

Moderator
Máximo Roa

Máximo Roa

Head of Orbital Robotics
DLR — German Aerospace Center

Miguel Olivares-Mendez

Prof. Miguel Olivares-Mendez

Head of Space Robotics Research Group
University of Luxembourg

Tim Flohrer

Tim Flohrer

Head of Space Debris Office
ESA — European Space Agency

Andrew Faiola

Andrew Faiola

Commercial Vice President
Astroscale

João Lupi

João Lupi

Co-Head of Space & Satellites
Abreu Advogados

Organizers

Fernando Ruiz Vincueria

Fernando Ruiz Vincueria

Principal Investigator, STRATOLASER
Founder, FRV Space Technologies

STRATOLASER
Johannes Bünz

Johannes Bünz

Portfolio Officer
European Innovation Council

European Commission
Frédéric Voulouzan

Frédéric Voulouzan

Program Manager — Space
EIC / EISMEA — European Commission

Julien Le Romancer

Julien Le Romancer

CTO & Co-founder
Osmos X

ALBATOR
Leonard Felicetti

Leonard Felicetti

Lecturer in Space Engineering
Cranfield University

DEXTER
Adam Baker

Adam Baker

Senior Project Engineer
Magdrive Space

DEXTER
Céline Dubron

Céline Dubron

Project Manager
Arcsec Space

AstrAware
Jennifer Kingston

Jennifer Kingston

Senior Lecturer in Space Systems
Cranfield University

DEXTER
Jaan Praks

Jaan Praks

Associate Professor
Aalto University

SPIDAR
Aníbal Ollero

Aníbal Ollero

Director, GRVC Robotics Laboratory
Universidad de Sevilla

STRATOLASER
David Tellet

David Tellet

Spacecraft Propulsion
Magdrive Space

DEXTER
Sergio de Florio

Sergio de Florio

Head of On-Orbit Servicing & Autonomous Spaceflight Lab
TU Berlin

gEICko
Tony Erdmann

Tony Erdmann

Lecturer & Researcher
TU Berlin

gEICko
Michele Maestrini

Michele Maestrini

Assistant Professor
SPIRE · Politecnico di Milano

AstrAware
Jorge Rodríguez Rubio

Jorge Rodríguez Rubio

AI & Software Engineer
STRATOLASER

STRATOLASER
Manuel Sanjurjo-Vivo

Manuel Sanjurjo-Vivo

Orbit Dynamics Team Lead
NorthStar Earth & Space

ALBATOR

Why has ADR not become operational?

Active Debris Removal (ADR) is widely recognised as a key enabler for the long-term sustainability of space activities, yet it remains largely confined to technology demonstrations and isolated missions. This Special Session moves beyond technical readiness discussions to address a systemic question: why has ADR not yet become an operational space infrastructure protection capability, and what are the barriers to the development of a sustainable market?

The session uses the EIC Pathfinder Challenge WP2024 portfolio as a case study to explore transversal barriers, while explicitly opening the discussion to the wider international community. Rather than focusing on individual mission concepts, it examines pro-active portfolio management, project synergies, and the technology, market and operational risks — including economic viability and decision-making authority — that must be resolved for ADR to scale.

Through a highly interactive fishbowl format driven by live polling, participants will discuss the roles of public institutions versus commercial actors, and realistic ADR objectives over the next 10, 20 and 30 years. The session brings together technical, programmatic, and economic perspectives, designed to complement — not duplicate — traditional technical sessions within the Space Debris symposium.

ADRSpace SustainabilityPortfolio ManagementEU Space PolicyEIC PathfinderGovernanceSpace Economics

The EU Portfolio — 7 Projects

The EIC Pathfinder Challenge "Strengthening the Sustainability and Resilience of EU Space Infrastructure" funded seven projects with a combined budget of approximately €28M under the Horizon Europe programme. These projects form the portfolio context for this Special Session.

STRATOLASER
Stratospheric Balloon-Based Laser Ablation System for Space Debris Removal

A stratospheric balloon-hosted laser platform for debris remediation. Operating above the atmosphere avoids turbulence, scattering, and enables UV wavelength operation. The mission progresses from ranging and nudging to full laser ablation for de-orbiting — at a fraction of the cost and complexity of space-based architectures.

Lead: AICIA — Spain
stratolaser.com →
ALBATOR
ECR-Based Multicharged Ion Beam for Active Debris Removal and Other Remediation Strategies

Ion beam gun based on electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) technology to de-orbit debris via contactless ion blowing. Targets fragments down to millimetre size, including post-collision debris clouds.

Lead: Osmos X — France
albator-eic.eu →
AstrAware
On-Board Dynamic Vision Sensor Suite for Enhanced Satellite Self and Situational Awareness

Onboard sensor suite using innovative dynamic vision sensors with novel data processing pipelines for real-time space situational awareness and satellite self-monitoring in orbit.

Lead: Politecnico di Milano — Italy
astraware-eic.eu →
DEXTER
Debris Extraction Tools for Extra-Terrestrial Recycling

Robotic tools to dismantle dysfunctional satellites in orbit and reuse their structural components — including converting aluminium into propellant. Reframes space debris as a resource rather than a hazard.

Lead: Cranfield University — United Kingdom
dexter-space.eu →
gEICko
Gecko-Based Innovative Capture Kit for Uncooperative and Unprepared Orbital Assets

Bio-inspired capture payload using gecko-inspired micro-patterned dry adhesives and tether-based mechanisms to dock with non-cooperative, tumbling debris for controlled re-entry or recycling.

Lead: Technische Universität Berlin — Germany
geicko.space →
SPIDAR
Space Debris Mapping with Photonic Integrated Circuit Lidar

PIC-based LiDAR transmitter for in-situ detection and characterisation of small debris objects. Addresses the fundamental gap in cataloguing centimetre-scale debris populations.

Lead: Aalto University — Finland
Portfolio page →
STORM
Solar Weather Forecasting Mission

Solar weather forecasting mission concept to improve prediction of space weather events affecting orbital decay rates, satellite lifetimes, and the evolution of the debris population.

Lead: Neutron Star Systems UG — Germany
Portfolio page →

Programme · 8 October · 16:15–17:30 · NEST Convention Center

The session combines a fishbowl discussion format with live audience polling. For each thematic round, the audience answers a live poll; results are displayed in real time and used to trigger the debate. Audience members may dynamically join the fishbowl.

16:15–16:20
Introduction & InstructionsOrganization and instructions for audience participation using the live polling app.
16:20–16:25
Pathfinder Portfolio OverviewHow the EU Pathfinder Challenge portfolio works — Stella Tkatchova, Former EIC Space Programme Manager.
16:25–16:35
Portfolio Projects — SnapshotsBrief 2-minute high-level snapshots of each of the 7 portfolio projects to establish a common baseline.
16:35–17:10
Interactive Fishbowl with Live PollingShort thematic rounds around 11 live poll questions. Results displayed in real time to trigger debate. Audience members may join the fishbowl dynamically.
17:10–17:30
Wrap-upSynthesis of voting results, key disagreements and open questions for the field.

Join the debate — scan to participate

The session uses Mentimeter for live polling. Scan the QR code during the session to vote. Results will be projected live and used to guide the fishbowl discussion.

QR code Mentimeter

Scan during the session to vote

menti.com · code shared live at session start

11 poll questions across three thematic rounds — Technology, Governance & Economics, and Market & Future Horizons:

Q1. Which ADR architecture is most likely to achieve the lowest cost at scale in the long term?

  • Dedicated one-target-per-mission removal spacecraft
  • Multi-target servicing vehicles (one mission, multiple removals)
  • Non-contact methods (e.g. laser or momentum transfer)
  • Hybrid approaches combining multiple concepts

Q2. What is the main technical bottleneck for scaling contact ADR from single missions to routine operations?

  • GNC during proximity operations
  • Reliable capture and detumbling of non-cooperative targets
  • Mission operations complexity and autonomy
  • End-of-life disposal and safety of the ADR system itself

Q3. What is the main technical uncertainty limiting non-contact (e.g. laser) ADR methods?

  • On-target momentum coupling efficiency and predictability
  • Pointing, tracking and beam control of fast-moving targets
  • Power generation and energy delivery at scale
  • Integration with existing SSA and space traffic management

Q4. What is the main factor (not only technical) preventing ADR from becoming operational today?

  • Technical maturity and reliability
  • Cost and lack of a clear, sustainable business case
  • Governance, liability and legal uncertainty
  • Lack of political will and clear decision authority
  • Insufficient coordination between actors

Q5. Does a pro-active portfolio-based research approach accelerate ADR progress?

  • Yes, through diversification and risk sharing
  • Partially, but it slows decision-making
  • No, it dilutes responsibility and focus
  • Too early to tell

Q6. Who should decide when ADR is needed?

  • National space agencies
  • An international organisation
  • Satellite operators collectively
  • Commercial service providers
  • A hybrid model

Q7. Who should primarily pay for ADR operations?

  • Public institutions
  • Polluter-pays principle
  • Insurance mechanisms
  • Mixed public-private funding
  • Market-driven services

Q8. What is realistically achievable for ADR?

  • 0–5 yr: demos only; 5–10 yr: limited ops; 10 yr: full infrastructure protection
  • 0–10 yr: demos; 10–20 yr: limited ops; 20–30 yr: full protection
  • Operational space domain infrastructure protection will not be sustainable

Q9. Is there a credible future market for commercial ADR and in-orbit recycling?

  • Yes, ADR and recycling will both become viable markets
  • ADR yes, recycling unlikely with decreasing launch costs
  • Only with strong and sustained public intervention

Q10. Should ADR be managed through an international body funded by mandatory contributions, similar to carbon pricing?

  • Yes, a global ADR authority with mandatory operator contributions is necessary
  • Yes, but only at regional level (e.g. EU-led)
  • No, ADR should remain voluntary and market-driven
  • No, such a mechanism is politically unrealistic

Q11. What are the barriers and opportunities for space SMEs and start-ups to attract private funding for debris remediation?

  • Limited number of commercial customers
  • High entry barriers
  • Others (open answer)

77th International Astronautical Congress

IAC 2026 takes place in Antalya, Türkiye — the first time the congress is hosted in Türkiye. Organised by the International Astronautical Federation (IAF), hosted by the Turkish Space Agency (TUA) and co-hosted by the SAHA İstanbul Aerospace Cluster. Theme: "The World Needs More Space."

Dates

5–9 October 2026

City

Antalya, Türkiye

Venue

NEST Convention Center

Special Session

8 Oct · 16:15–17:30

Get in touch

Questions about the session, speaker invitations, or media enquiries — reach the lead organizer directly.

Or email directly: frvincueria@us.es

Register for IAC 2026

Attendance at the Special Session requires IAC 2026 congress registration.